Compare · ZTNA
Skipr and zero trust network access
Zero trust network access replaced implicit network trust with per-connection verification. That is the right principle, applied at the connection layer. Autonomous execution moves the interesting decision one layer up, to the action itself.
What ZTNA does well
- Removing implicit trust from the network
- Per-connection verification of user, device and posture
- Reducing exposed attack surface compared with flat network access
- Consistent remote access without traditional VPN topology
Where it stops
- Once the connection is allowed, the actions across it are not individually arbitrated
- Policy is expressed in terms of resources and endpoints, not intents and data
- Agent and tool invocations often ride existing allowed paths
- Evidence records connections, not decisions about actions
What changes with autonomous execution
- The risky unit is the operation an agent performs, not the tunnel it uses
- Data-level scope matters as much as network reachability
- Proof obligations describe behaviour, not connectivity
How Skipr complements it
- ZTNA governs reachability; Skipr governs what happens once reachable
- DataConnect applies residency and policy at query time, inside the allowed path
- The decision and its scope are recorded as evidence at the point of enforcement
Side by side
| Dimension | ZTNA | Skipr |
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Connection | Action |
| Policy vocabulary | Users, devices, resources | Intent, identity, context, data, scope |
| Autonomous actors | Treated as clients | Treated as governed principals |
| Evidence | Connection logs | Signed decision and execution record |
Questions
- Do I still need ZTNA?
- If it is how your principals reach systems, yes. Skipr does not replace network access control.
- Is Skipr a network product?
- No. It operates on actions and their context, not on packets and tunnels.
- Where do the two meet?
- A connection permitted by ZTNA still carries actions that Skipr arbitrates individually.
Continue
Other comparisons
- AI governance and runtime governanceAI governance decides and documents what should be allowed. Runtime governance enforces it in the path of the action and proves the outcome. Both are needed.
- Skipr and identity and access managementIAM establishes who a principal is and what they may reach. Skipr decides whether a specific action may execute right now, and proves it.
- Skipr and privileged access managementPAM controls privileged sessions and credentials for administrators. Skipr governs every action — human, agent, application or machine — at runtime.